Friday, December 15, 2017
More News From OTOY!
Yesterday, one of Taylor Frigon Capital Partner's largest holdings, OTOY, Inc., announced the launch of the commercial version of OctaneRender for the Unity rendering engine. Unity is the largest computer graphics (CG) development platform serving millions of developers who create CG games and simulations.
This is the result of years of development work at OTOY and is a major step towards the realization of the company's goal to be the premiere capturing, rendering and streaming engine for developers of CG content, and eventually consumers of all types.
Taylor Frigon is proud of its affiliation with Jules Urbach and Alissa Grainger, whose vision and hard work has now come to fruition. Read the post of the announcement here. And if you are ready to create, buy it here!
Disclosures: Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC (“Taylor Frigon”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Taylor Frigon. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Taylor Frigon is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Taylor Frigon’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. If you are a Taylor Frigon client, please remember to contact Taylor Frigon, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services.
Thursday, October 12, 2017
Investment Climate October 2017: A Paradigm Shift
In our last Investment Climate, we suggested that the “correction” many growth-oriented companies experienced in the second quarter would be short-lived and business merits would drive the values of those companies higher in the future. While some technology-related companies remained under pressure, as of the end of the third quarter, values resumed their up trend amongst broader growth companies. TFCM growth portfolios reached the highest quarter-end values in the history of the firm! While the drumbeat of “record highs” continues and the financial punditry gnashes its collective teeth over that fact, we remain convinced that values are still not fully reflected in most of the companies throughout our portfolio. And while 5-10% corrections should be expected at any time, barring a major external event, market values should continue higher over the coming months and years.
Income investments have been in much more of a subdued pattern in the last year as these types of investments grapple with higher interest rates and the actions on the part of the US Federal Reserve to “normalize” monetary policy. For investors who require ongoing cash flow and a more stable underlying value to their portfolio, the values represented in certain income securities, particularly high-yield energy-related issues and certain “special situation” securities, offer very good opportunities. While we believe interest rates will rise in the near and longer term, we believe the move will be gradual and won’t derail economic activity. With that in mind, we continue to prefer equity-oriented income securities and avoid most long-term, fixed-income investments currently.
What we want to convey to our clients today is that we are experiencing some of the most important shifts in our investment paradigms and themes that we have witnessed in the last 20 years! We believe there is a major transformation happening in the way computing is done and in the way the internet operates. Much of this is centered on “blockchain” technology and the re-emergence of distributed computing. The disruption that this will create will be as massive, if not more so, as the advent of the internet of the 1990s, which was built upon the centralization of data and computing power. Every company is either susceptible to this transformation or will benefit from this transformation, and you can be assured that we are feverishly researching and positioning our portfolios to take advantage of this monumental phenomenon. Stay tuned for much more in the coming quarters and years as we wade through this exciting time in the history of the world!
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC (“Taylor Frigon”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Taylor Frigon. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Taylor Frigon is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Taylor Frigon’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. If you are a Taylor Frigon client, please remember to contact Taylor Frigon, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services.
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Big Announcements from TFCP holdings, Otoy and ASOCS
It's been a big week for Taylor Frigon Capital Partners, LP as two of its holdings, ASOCS and Otoy Inc., have made major announcements recently. Just last week, Otoy's Jules Urbach announced his contribution to the new Render Economy, Rendertoken.com. To learn about this revolutionizing technology it's best to read his articles in Medium.com, HERE and HERE.
And today, ASOCS announced its launch of Cyrus, an "on-premise mobile cloud for enterprises that addresses the mobile connectivity, capacity and security challenges associated with true digital transformation. By giving enterprises ownership and control of their mobile networks, Cyrus fundamentally changes how users wirelessly connect with and leverage the internet inside large buildings and venues such as corporate offices, sports arenas, mixed-use buildings, retail establishments, hotels, hospitals, and more." Read the announcement HERE.
Disclosures: Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC (“Taylor Frigon”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Taylor Frigon. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Taylor Frigon is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Taylor Frigon’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. If you are a Taylor Frigon client, please remember to contact Taylor Frigon, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services.
Wednesday, September 6, 2017
Don't Fear Investment in Israel
Chief Investment Officer, Gerry Frigon, yesterday posted a blog, "Don't Fear Investment in Israel," in the Times of Israel discussing the advantages of investing in Israeli companies. As the blog explains, "We never set out to invest in Israel just for the sake of investing there. Quite the contrary, we simply follow the most important investment ideas and themes we could find, which led us to the vibrant country of Israel." READ MORE
Disclosures: Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC (“Taylor Frigon”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Taylor Frigon. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Taylor Frigon is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Taylor Frigon’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. If you are a Taylor Frigon client, please remember to contact Taylor Frigon, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services.
Wednesday, August 23, 2017
The State of Technology
We have referenced Bret Swanson's work in the past in this blog.
In his latest article he reinforces the research he recently conducted with Michael Mandel and debunks two extreme, and opposing views on the state of technology offered by Economist Robert Gordon, and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Gordon argues that innovation is dead, and Musk argues we need to regulate the fast pace of technological growth, lest we kill all the jobs.
As Bret brilliantly argues, both are wrong! And as we have stated so many times in our writings over the years, one solution to the "roadblock" that is hindering the economy is less burdensome taxation. This would unleash capital spending by the part of the economy that has underspent on technology investment and has relegated the majority of industry to an inefficient existence. We would also add that a reduction in the regulatory burden on these businesses would also help greatly.
Nonetheless, Bret hits hits the nail on the head, in our view, and we would urge all investors to read his pieces and understand these issues thoroughly.
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC (“Taylor Frigon”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Taylor Frigon. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Taylor Frigon is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Taylor Frigon’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. If you are a Taylor Frigon client, please remember to contact Taylor Frigon, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services.
Friday, August 11, 2017
A Correction Is Here
With all the news about escalating tensions regarding North Korea, which finally seemed to gain the attention of the market this week, much has been lost on what appears to be a correction going on in some of the highest growth-potential companies in the economy.
The second quarter earnings reports from many companies were stellar, in some cases, and good in others. Rarely were they poor; at least in companies we follow or own in our portfolios. The number of companies in our portfolios reporting favorably, as far as actual second quarter earnings, were plentiful. However, when referring to guidance for the third quarter, expectations were running very high for many companies and any sign of "delays" or "transitions" in business activity caused violent reactions in a number of the best-performing businesses in the market. Even in companies whose guidance was positive, the old "buy on rumor, sell on fact" phenomenon kicked in and many of those stock prices were met with healthy declines. A sure sign, in our view, that we are in a correction.
In our recent Investment Climate we pondered the likelihood of a correction in the market and even suggested it would be healthy. Given that we have seen some really significant moves up in prices, it does not surprise us that we are seeing this correction, even if it is somewhat "stealth" at this point. It may well be that it is not fully complete since it has not been clearly evident in the major stock market indices. It should be emphasized that these are normal and healthy actions, and while there are often "hiccups" in business activity over the course of any company's life span, we are quite encouraged by the underlying business trends we are seeing with respect to most companies in our portfolios.
We stand ready to take advantage and become more aggressive as prices "back and fill" and recommend that investors do the same over the coming weeks as we move through this correction, recognizing one rarely chooses bottoms.
Lastly, returning to geopolitical circumstances, North Korea has been a disaster for over 25 years and four different U.S. presidential administrations, from both political parties, have failed to adequately handle the situation. While we have no way to accurately predict how this will play out, we are extremely confident that the U.S. will prevail should it be necessary to take military action in order to neutralize the North Korean regime. We believe that military action remains remote at this point and serious diplomatic efforts are underway to address the situation, involving South Korea, Japan and most notably, China. We would consider any further weakness that develops in stock prices as a result of this situation another buying opportunity.
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC (“Taylor Frigon”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Taylor Frigon. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Taylor Frigon is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Taylor Frigon’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. If you are a Taylor Frigon client, please remember to contact Taylor Frigon, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services.
The second quarter earnings reports from many companies were stellar, in some cases, and good in others. Rarely were they poor; at least in companies we follow or own in our portfolios. The number of companies in our portfolios reporting favorably, as far as actual second quarter earnings, were plentiful. However, when referring to guidance for the third quarter, expectations were running very high for many companies and any sign of "delays" or "transitions" in business activity caused violent reactions in a number of the best-performing businesses in the market. Even in companies whose guidance was positive, the old "buy on rumor, sell on fact" phenomenon kicked in and many of those stock prices were met with healthy declines. A sure sign, in our view, that we are in a correction.
In our recent Investment Climate we pondered the likelihood of a correction in the market and even suggested it would be healthy. Given that we have seen some really significant moves up in prices, it does not surprise us that we are seeing this correction, even if it is somewhat "stealth" at this point. It may well be that it is not fully complete since it has not been clearly evident in the major stock market indices. It should be emphasized that these are normal and healthy actions, and while there are often "hiccups" in business activity over the course of any company's life span, we are quite encouraged by the underlying business trends we are seeing with respect to most companies in our portfolios.
We stand ready to take advantage and become more aggressive as prices "back and fill" and recommend that investors do the same over the coming weeks as we move through this correction, recognizing one rarely chooses bottoms.
Lastly, returning to geopolitical circumstances, North Korea has been a disaster for over 25 years and four different U.S. presidential administrations, from both political parties, have failed to adequately handle the situation. While we have no way to accurately predict how this will play out, we are extremely confident that the U.S. will prevail should it be necessary to take military action in order to neutralize the North Korean regime. We believe that military action remains remote at this point and serious diplomatic efforts are underway to address the situation, involving South Korea, Japan and most notably, China. We would consider any further weakness that develops in stock prices as a result of this situation another buying opportunity.
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC (“Taylor Frigon”), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this newsletter serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Taylor Frigon. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. Taylor Frigon is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the newsletter content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Taylor Frigon’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available upon request. If you are a Taylor Frigon client, please remember to contact Taylor Frigon, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services.
Friday, July 7, 2017
More Fed Fear
At TFCM, we couldn't disagree with this line of thinking more vehemently!
Not that a correction in stocks may happen, it surely may. And suggesting it may happen in the autumn is no surprise given that autumn tends to be the weak part of the year, historically. But it is with the "trading" mentality, and most significantly, the view regarding the Fed's influence that we take issue.
This view of the world, that the Fed is thoroughly responsible for what happens in the economy is nonsense, in our opinion! These ideas are what contribute to volatility and poor economic performance, quite the contrary to what the author suggests.
The Fed was not responsible for the move in stocks. It was not TARP, QE, or anything government related. These policies have only served to act as a weight on growth. Instead, it is corporate earnings, driven by the business community's relentless ability to "get by in spite." that has driven markets higher and kept the economy growing, albeit very slowly.
Our view is that the Fed is behind the curve on tightening! They should have been tightening much sooner and that includes shrinking their balance sheet. The expansion of the balance sheet at the Fed (QE) has done nothing to help the market/economy in that those money's have sat idle on reserve at the Fed, paying banks interest instead of incentivizing them to lend.
QE was put into action in October 2008, in the midst of the "financial crisis". After the November 2008 election, the market proceeded to drop another 30%. It was not until March 9, 2009 that the market bottomed, consistent with the timing of Congress putting a stop to the insane mark-to-market accounting rule that relegated banks illiquid (and perceived insolvent). QE has been a drag and will continue to be so until it is extinguished completely.
That said, looked at in the context of the 21st Century (17 years now), the market is not at all extended. It took years for the S&P 500 to cross back over the top it made in 2000. And even more years for the NASDAQ to do the same. People with the view of the world described in this article seem to have this uncanny ability to think the world began March 9, 2009, the very bottom of the bear market. This is also nonsense. The series of "crises" that began with the dot.com blow up (and tech/telecom meltdown that followed), the 9/11/2001 attack, and the mortgage and credit crisis (a self-inflicted wound due to mark-to-market), confounded by horrific policies from two presidential administrations from both political parties, has served to stultify the economy, create a "perma-crisis" mentality, and generally keep a lid on growth.
If the current government is successful in reforming the tax code (simpler, with lower/flatter rates), and continues to ease the excessive burden of government regulations on businesses large and small (most notably small), then the pace of growth will pick up and the Fed's move to "lessen" their impact by eliminating QE and keeping rates at a level commensurate with the new, higher rate of economic growth, will be further stimulative.
The main worry, in our view, is the Fed underwhelming with its attempt to get out of crisis mode. We shall see how this plays out, but should they even remotely be successful with this move, then many of the themes in our portfolio, which we believe have been held back by the policies of the last 15-20 years, will be unleashed in a much bigger way and be reflected in considerably higher prices. If not, and the old ways continue to dominate, then we will "get by in spite".
Monday, June 5, 2017
What About Productivity?
For years we have been arguing that the "heavy hand" of government, with all its best intentions, has served to stultify economic growth. This comes in the form of tax rates that are too high and an overly complex tax code, both on corporations (which we would argue should pay no taxes) and individuals, as well as burdensome regulations that serve to limit the ability of businesses to grow.
There has been much talk about why productivity has been so slow in the last decade or so and we think these factors have had a direct impact on that phenomenon. This has served to create an environment of extreme angst amongst the citizenry and has manifested itself in one of the most vitriolic political environments ever. While we would argue some of the slower productivity growth is due to poor methods of measurement that don't accurately take into account the impact of technologies such as the smart phone, there is definitely a drag happening and the culprit is clear.
But how do we prove this?
Economists Michael Mandel and Bret Swanson, in their co-authored essay "The Coming Productivity Boom: Transforming The Physical Economy With Information", have hit the nail on the head and have backed up their claims with hard data that explains how we got to the point we are at and how to remedy the problem.
One of the key statements in the piece, from our perspective, and one that explains why lack of productivity growth is troubling, as well as why the tone of the nation is so sour:
"...if we get stuck in a world of slow productivity growth, we face some tough choices. With a fixed or slow-growing economic pie, the only way to make one group better off is to make another group worse off. Politics turns mean and nasty."
Mandel and Swanson point out that traditional "physical industries" (healthcare, manufacturing, energy, transportation, education, agriculture, retail, urban travel services), which make up 75% of private-sector employment and 75% of private-sector GDP, have made up only 30% of investment in information technology. Meanwhile, the "digital industries" which make up 25% of employment and only 30% of GDP have made up 70% of investment in information technology. Mandel and Swanson call this "The Information Gap" and suggest the culprit is -- as we have stated for years -- too much taxation and regulation!
The most heavily regulated industries are those defined as "physical." It is not coincidental that the effects of slower productivity growth have been felt the most in those spaces, as the data suggests in Mandel and Swanson's piece.
Michael and Bret make the case that this is all about to change as the physical industries are "freed up" to spend more heavily on the necessary information technology that will allow them to "catch up" in the productivity growth race. Their piece is crucial reading for those that want to be adequately informed about the issues that drive economic growth, or, conversely, keep the economy weak.
We believe we are well-positioned to benefit as physical industries make this adjustment!
Wednesday, March 29, 2017
Meet your new robot asset manager
Yesterday afternoon, the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and other outlets reported that Black Rock, the world's largest investment fund management company with $5.1 trillion in assets under management, is radically revising its equity management offerings by announcing what the Times calls "an ambitious plan to consolidate a large number of actively managed mutual funds with peers that rely more on algorithms and models to pick stocks."
The move is being heralded as a sign of things to come in the world of asset management. Only a small percentage of assets managed at Black Rock were actively managed before the move -- about $201 billion at present, according to the Times story -- due to the firm's focus on so-called passive strategies, including ETFs (Black Rock owns iShares, acquired from Barclay's) and index funds. Now, the firm is reducing its emphasis on active management still further, firing several active portfolio managers and supporting staff, and instead emphasizing a lineup of "quant" funds, which rely more on computer models and algorithms. The news headlines are calling this move "Machines Rising over Managers to Pick Stocks" and "Relying more on robots rather than humans."
Reading further into the company's reasoning reveals that the firm's equity asset managers had underperformed index funds in recent years, that the shift to algorithms rather than managers allows lower management fees, and that leadership believes new technologies such as "big data or even artificial intelligence" are making human-based investing less relevant. The executive in charge of the change says, "The old way of people sitting in a room picking stocks, thinking they are smarter than the next guy -- that does not work anymore."
The Journal article does note, however, that Black Rock will retain some actively managed offerings, including "country- and sector-focused stock products in which executives believe they can outperform, funds that pursue specific outcomes such as social impacts, and riskier funds that make more concentrated bets" but that "The changes weed out actively managed stock funds that closely follow indexes."
As active managers ourselves, we approve of these changes at Black Rock, and do not see them as the "end of active management" due to the "superiority of the robots" (or the quants) at all. In fact, we believe that the largest mutual fund company in the world has just publicly acknowledged the drawbacks of huge funds that are forced by their size to "closely follow indexes" and has made a rational decision to focus on other strategies -- including those that make "more concentrated" investments (which is a strategy that we ourselves favor, and one we have used to outperform indexes over long periods of time).
In fact, we noted almost two years ago that the Black Rock CEO had inadvertently admitted what we believe to be one of the central problems of index and ETF investing -- the fact that they are forced to own everything, good and bad -- during an interview alongside Carl Icahn that turned into a fairly exciting debate. The same criticism can be applied to "actively managed stock funds that closely follow indexes."
That said, we personally do not favor quant strategies, for reasons we have detailed in previous posts (including one from 2010 discussing a story touting "AI that picks stocks better than the pros"). We believe that the single most important factor of successful investing involves having a consistent investment philosophy which informs your selection of companies whose stock you will own. This is the opposite of what algorithm-based strategies usually do -- because those algorithms are frequently changed to try to capture "what's working now." And, on a larger scale, Black Rock's shift towards more emphasis on quant strategies (in addition to their existing emphasis on ETFs and indexes) can also be seen as a shift towards "what's working now."
Of course, if their strategy is flawed, then they should change their strategy. However, we advise investors to be very careful when selecting these new strategies, if those strategies themselves are not grounded in a consistent investment discipline. Otherwise, in a few years, they might find themselves being told that now it's time to shift into the new "next best thing."
IMPORTANT
DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future
results. Different types of investments
involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future
performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product
(including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or
undertaken by Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC), or any non-investment
related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be
profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s),
be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove
successful. Due to various factors, including
changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be
reflective of current opinions or positions.
Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information
contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for,
personalized investment advice from Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC. To the extent that a reader has any questions
regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her
individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor
of his/her choosing. Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC is neither a law firm
nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content
should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the Taylor Frigon
Capital Management LLC’s current written disclosure statement discussing our
advisory services and fees is available for review upon request. Please
Note: Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC does not make any
representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability,
completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated
third party, whether linked to Taylor Frigon Capital Management LLC’s web site
or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such
content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only
and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.
Monday, January 9, 2017
Investment Climate Jan 2017 - Favorable Winds of Change
We had no idea who would win the election, or what the market would do in the aftermath regardless of the results. Yet, it really does not surprise us that the market has reacted well, especially in light of the policy issues that Trump has espoused, most notable of which is a reduction in tax rates and simplification of the tax code, as well as a reduction in the level of regulation that has held back businesses for so long.
It was just in our last Investment Climate where we pointed out, yet again, how big government has held back business. If the new Trump administration can be successful in moving forward on those two major policies, then much of the “trade” issues that Mr. Trump has also railed about should take care of themselves because we should witness considerable increase in capital investment and general business activity.
If the investment climate should finally become more favorable, then that should only enhance the prospects for many of the investments themes on which we have focused in our portfolios. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, such an environment would likely benefit small business the most. We have been quite concerned about the lack of new, innovative businesses coming about, and the resulting lack of initial public offerings in the stock market. This desperately needs to change, and if it does, we could witness the type of market activity that was brought about by the sea change witnessed back in 1980, which led to the significant market moves of the 1980s and 1990s.
We are very encouraged and would argue that it’s been quite a long time since the wind has been at the back of businesses. This isn’t altering our investment approach at all. We just have even more confidence in its ultimate success!